Blog
2024年03月08日 [世界史の理解]
タカスギ世界史研究所へようこそ/welcome to Takasugi Institute (21)
今回は(29)の続きとなります。当研究所が『三国同盟同盟秘史』や『リッベントロップ』でも紹介させていただきましたが、親独主義の形成が主に国民軍の創設の過程で形成されていったことを強調してきました。それが第一次世界大戦を経て生き残り第二次世界大戦期にも及ぶことになったわけです。1920年代からの日本における軍部の台頭の背景にはナチスの台頭がモデルにありましたが、明確な表現は見当たりません。このことは日米開戦に至るまでの大本営政府連絡会議などでも同じことが言えます。明確な表現があればそれは研究対象となりますが、ほとんどないとなるとそれは崇拝の対象となってしまいイメージが先行し非常に危険なものとなります。全ては第二次世界大戦後に総括されることとなり、同じA級戦犯でも親独主義を推進した松岡洋右、大島浩、白鳥敏夫が別格のA級戦犯とされていますが果たしてそれでいいのでしょうか？
This time, it will be a continuation of (29). Our institute also introduced it in "The Secret History of the Tripartite Treaty" and “Ribbentrops", but we have emphasized that the formation of pro-Germanism was mainly formed in the process of the creation of the National Army. That's why it survived the First World War and extended to the Second World War. The background of the rise of the military faction in Japan from the 1920s was modeled on the rise of the Nazis, but there is no clear expression. The same can be said for the large headquarters-government liaison meeting leading up to the start of the war between Japan and the United States. If there is a clear expression, it will be subject to research, but if there are few, it will be subject to worship and it will be very dangerous. Everything will be summarized after World War II, and even the same A-class war criminals, Yosuke Matsuoka, Hiroshi Oshima, and Toshio Shiratori, who promoted pro-Germanism, are exceptional war criminals, but is that really appropriate?
This time, it will be a continuation of (29). Our institute also introduced it in "The Secret History of the Tripartite Treaty" and “Ribbentrops", but we have emphasized that the formation of pro-Germanism was mainly formed in the process of the creation of the National Army. That's why it survived the First World War and extended to the Second World War. The background of the rise of the military faction in Japan from the 1920s was modeled on the rise of the Nazis, but there is no clear expression. The same can be said for the large headquarters-government liaison meeting leading up to the start of the war between Japan and the United States. If there is a clear expression, it will be subject to research, but if there are few, it will be subject to worship and it will be very dangerous. Everything will be summarized after World War II, and even the same A-class war criminals, Yosuke Matsuoka, Hiroshi Oshima, and Toshio Shiratori, who promoted pro-Germanism, are exceptional war criminals, but is that really appropriate?
